Unveiling the role of NK cells, NKT-like cells, and γδ cells in pathogenesis of type 1 reactions in leprosy.

Leprosy is a disease with spectral clinical manifestations along with two types of reactions, type 1 reaction (T1R) and type 2 reaction (T2R). T1R especially occurs because of the defensive upgradation of cell-mediated immunity (CMI) to M. leprae antigens. T1R is the main cause of disability in leprosy. The role of conventional adaptive T cells has been well studied to understand T1R. A comprehensive understanding of the role of unconventional T cells in the manifestation of inflammation during T1R is crucial and has not been studied. In our study, we found significantly higher plasma levels of TNFα, IL1ß, IL17, and IP10 in T1R when compared to non-reaction (NR). Gene expression for cytokines in blood circulation by qPCR showed significantly higher expression of IFNγ, IP10, TNFα, IL6, IL17A and chemokines CCL3, CCR1, CCR5, and CXCR3 in T1R as compared to NR. Frequencies of NKT-like cells (48.7 %) and NK cells (22.3 %) were found significantly higher in T1R in comparison to NR (36.9 %, 18.3 %, respectively) (p = 0.0001). Significantly lower levels of γδT cells (3.32 %) were observed in T1R in comparison to NR (5.16 %). The present study has provided evidence for the first time on the role of plausible unconventional T cells in the immunopathogenesis of T1R in leprosy.

Association of CC-chemokine ligand-2 gene polymorphisms with leprosy reactions.

BACKGROUND: C-C motif chemokine ligand 2, a gene that codes for a protein involved in inflammation. Certain SNPs in the CCL2 gene have been studied for their potential associations with susceptibility to various diseases. These SNPs may affect the production and function of the CCL2 protein, which is involved in the recruitment of immune cells to the site of inflammation. Variations in CCL2 may influence the immune response to Mycobacterium leprae infection. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of the C-C motif chemokine ligand-2 single nucleotide polymorphisms with leprosy. METHODS: CCL2 single nucleotide polymorphisms were analyzed in a total of 975 leprosy patients and 357 healthy controls. Of those, 577 leprosy and 288 healthy controls were analyzed by PCR-RFLP for CCL2 -2518 A>G, 535 leprosy and 290 controls for CCL2 -362 G>C, 295 leprosy and 240 controls for CCL2 -2134 T>G, 325 leprosy and 288 controls for CCL2 -1549 A>T SNPs by melting curve analysis using hybridization probe chemistry and detection by fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) technique in Realtime PCR. The levels of CCL2, IL-12p70, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and TGF-ß were estimated in sera samples and correlated with CCL2 genotypes. RESULTS: The frequency of the GCT (-2518 A>G, -362 G>C, -2134 T>G) haplotype is observed to be higher in leprosy patients compared to healthy controls (P = 0.04). There was no significant difference observed in genotypic frequencies between leprosy patients and healthy controls {(-2518A>G, p = 0.53), (-362 G>C, p = 0.01), (-2134 T>G, p = 0.10)}. G allele at the -2134 site is predominant in leprosy (borderline) without any reaction (8 %) compared to borderline patients with RR reactions (2.1 %) (P = 0.03). GG genotype (p = 0.008) and G allele at -2518 (p = 0.030) of the CCL 2 gene were found to be associated with patients with ENL reaction. An elevated level of serum CCL2 was observed in leprosy patients with the -2518 AA and AG genotypes (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: G allele and GG genotype at the CCL2 -2518 site are associated with a risk of ENL reactions.

Exploring the Cell Wall and Secretory Proteins of Mycobacterium leprae as Biomarkers.

The bacterial cell wall is composed of a wide variety of intricate proteins in addition to lipids, glycolipids, and polymers. Given the diversity of cell wall proteins among bacterial species, they are a feasible target for biomarker identification and characterization in clinical research and diagnosis of the disease. The slow growth rate of Mycobacterium leprae poses a major hurdle in the accurate diagnosis of leprosy before the onset of peripheral neuropathy. The use of biomarker- based diagnostic methods can help in preventing the spread and manifestation of leprosy. Despite many advances in research methods and techniques, there remains a knowledge gap regarding the cell wall proteomes of M. leprae that can be used as biomarkers. The cell wall and secretory proteins of M. leprae are the major focus of this review article. This article enfolds the characteristics and functions of M. leprae cell wall proteins and gives an insight into those cell wall proteins that are yet to be established as biomarkers. Tools and techniques used in cell wall extraction and biomarker identification can also be explored in this article.

Analysis of socioeconomic condition and bacillary index with respect to the development of Hansen's disease.

Background: Leprosy is a chronic granulomatous infection caused by Mycobacterium leprae or Mycobacterium lepromatosis and mainly affects the skin and peripheral nerves. Although treatable, its early intervention can significantly reduce the occurrence of disability. India accounts for more than half of new cases globally. This study was undertaken to better understand the clinical traits of newly diagnosed cases in a tertiary facility of Western Uttar Pradesh, and a few from Madhya Pradesh and Uttarakhand. Methods: The observational prospective study was carried out on all the newly diagnosed leprosy cases who visited the Outpatient Department of ICMR-National JALMA Institute for Leprosy and Other Mycobacterial Diseases, Agra, during October 2019-December 2022. After obtaining answers to a prestructured questionnaire with their consent, participants were enrolled in the study and underwent clinical examination and a slit-skin smear test. Results: A total of 56 cases were investigated, and among them, 20 (35.7%) and 36 (64.3%) women and men, respectively, had positive contact with persons affected by leprosy either within family, friends, or neighbors. It is observed that due to the delayed detection of leprosy cases, paucibacillary (PB) patients converted into multibacillary (MB) patients, and the number of MB cases is much higher compared to PB cases. Conclusion: Leprosy instances continue to spread frequently from sick to healthy people indicating continued transmission of leprosy in society. Multidrug therapy in the management of leprosy cases is effective; however, early diagnosis of PB cases is still a challenge and needs to be addressed on priority.

Lymphoepithelial Carcinoma of the Breast.

Lymphoepithelial malignancy is an extremely rare carcinoma of the breast characterized by a confusing histopathological picture resembling medullary carcinomas, lymphoma, etc. It has also been reported in other regions of the body like salivary glands, nasopharyngeal area and sometimes the lung. Due to its rare presence and difficult diagnosis, the treatment is often prolonged and delayed. Here we present a case report of a 56-year-old lady who was eventually diagnosed as lymphoepithelial carcinoma of the breast. Her journey of evaluation and treatment was fraught with pathological nuances and an elimination drill of multiple differentials before concluding this rare diagnosis. Although lymphoepithelial-like carcinoma is a rare entity, multiple cases have been reported in the literature and their review is mandated to further our clinical knowledge about the oncological treatment and expected prognosis of such cases in the future. Our patient underwent a simple mastectomy, followed by chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and is completely asymptomatic now. She has been cancer-free for the last seven years so far.

An evidence and reasoning based differential diagnosis of a case of leprosy reinfection from reaction and relapse.

Leprosy is caused by Mycobacterium leprae (M. leprae) and is unique in terms of the chronicity of the disease and its prolonged treatment protocol. Even after the introduction of multidrug therapy (MDT) by World health organization (WHO), large numbers of new cases (nearly 200,000) of leprosy are reported yearly, indicating active transmission, especially in developing countries. Recurrent clinical manifestations after MDT can occur due to leprosy reactions, relapse or reinfection. It is very difficult to differentiate reaction, relapse and reinfection. Here we categorized a recent case of reoccurrence of leprosy as reinfection by differentiating it from reaction and relapse based on evidence and by analysing the clinical data of the patient.

Molecular detection of Mycobacterium leprae using RLEP-PCR in post elimination era of leprosy.

Leprosy is considered as a contagious disease and is still a health problem in several countries including India. Diagnosis of leprosy is based either on clinical findings or on acid fast bacilli staining. Due to low sensitivity of acid fast bacilli staining most of the leprosy cases were remained undetected. The present study aims to assess the efficacy of RLEP-PCR in the field condition where majority of the patients are acid fast bacilli negative and have early disease. A total of 80 suspected leprosy cases were recruited. Slit skin smear samples were taken for microscopy and molecular experimentation. DNA was extracted and RLEP-PCR was executed for all the 80 samples. To establish the statistical correlation χ2 test and Fisher's exact test were made. To elucidate the sensitivity of the test Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) was drawn. These 80 leprosy patients comprised of 38 paucibacillary and 42 multibacillary leprosy cases. Of 80 leprosy patients 18 (22.5%) were AFB positive while 53 (66.25%) leprosy cases were RLEP-PCR positive. The results of test of significance (P=0.0001) and Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) (0.614) indicated that the RLEP-PCR is a better diagnostic tool over AFB microscopy in case detection of leprosy. From the findings we concluded that RLEP-PCR could be used for the definitive detection of leprosy cases in accordance with the clinical findings in the field condition in the post elimination era of leprosy.

Dominant marker (inter-simple sequence repeat-polymerase chain reaction) versus codominant marker (RLEP-polymerase chain reaction) for laboratory diagnosis of leprosy: A comparative evaluation.

Background: Leprosy is a contagious disease and was eliminated globally in 2002. Since then, new cases were continuously detected from different parts of the world. Untreated leprosy cases shed millions of bacteria and are the main cause of dissemination of the disease. Currently, leprosy is detected by acid-fast bacilli (AFB) microscopy and has a low sensitivity ranging from 10% to 50%. The correlation between clinical findings and microscopy is unable to provide a conclusive case detection. Thus, in the present study, we compared to molecular methods, namely RLEP-polymerase chain reaction (RLEP-PCR) and inter-simple sequence repeat-PCR (ISSR-PCR) taking AFB microscopy as a gold standard for the detection of leprosy. Methods: A total of 168 clinically diagnosed leprosy patients were recruited in this study including 58 multibacillary and 110 paucibacillary patients. Slit-skin smear samples were taken for both microscopy and molecular study. Primers for RLEP-PCR were taken from the previous reports. The primers for ISSR-PCR were designed by screening the whole genome of Mycobacterium leprae TN strain (GenBank accession AL450380) for the presence of simple sequence repeats. One primer (TA)8CA3was synthesized and used for molecular amplification of ISSR-PCR. Results: We found that the efficacy of the AFB microscopy was 24.40%, whereas the efficacy of RLEP-PCR and ISSR-PCR was 63.09% and 73.21% (P = 0.000, 0.000, and 0.469), respectively. The area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic curve for the comparison of three diagnostic methods was 0.845. An enhancement of 48.81% in the case detection rate by ISSR-PCR over AFB microscopy and 10.12% over RLEP-PCR was also found. Our study clearly reveals that ISSR-PCR is a better tool for diagnosis of leprosy than AFB microscopy and RLEP-PCR. Interestingly, both the PCR techniques RLEP-PCR and ISSR-PCR are able to detect samples which were negative for AFB microscopy. Conclusion: Thus, the demonstration of ISSR-PCR in SSS samples can provide a better sensitive and confirmative tool for early diagnosis of leprosy.

Multiple strain infection of Mycobacterium leprae in a family having 4 patients: A study employing short tandem repeats.

BACKGROUND: Leprosy is a slow, chronic disorder caused by Mycobacterium leprae. India has achieved elimination of leprosy in December 2005 but new cases are being detected and continue to occur in some endemic pockets. The possible ways of transmission of leprosy is not fully understood and is believed that leprosy is transmitted from person to person in long term contact. Studying the transmission dynamics is further complicated by inability to grow M. leprae in culture medium and lack of animal models. More than one family members were found to be affected by leprosy in some highly endemic pockets. This study reported the transmission pattern of leprosy in a family having 4 patients. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We investigated the transmission of leprosy in a single family having 4 patients using microsatellite typing. DNA was isolated from slit skin smear samples taken from the patients and the isolated DNA were amplified using microsatellite loci TA11CA3. The amplified products were sequenced using Sanger's sequencing methods and the copy number variation in the microsatellite loci between strains were elucidated by multiple sequence alignment. The result showed that all the 4 members of the family acquired infection from 3 different strains of M. leprae from 3 different sources. The elder and middle daughters were infected by same types of strains having the repeat unit TA13CA3 and could have acquired the infection from social contacts of leprosy cases while the father and younger daughter were infected by strains with the repeat unit TA12CA3 and TA11CA3 and could have acquired infection from social contacts. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The study suggested that three family members viz, elder daughter, father and younger daughter could be infected by M. leprae from 3 different sources and the history of the disease and genetic analysis showed that the middle daughter acquired infection from her elder sister in due course of contact. This study implies that the transmission of leprosy not only occurred amongst the house hold members but also has been transmitted from social and neighborhood contacts in long term association with the them.

Notch signaling induces lymphoproliferation, T helper cell activation and Th1/Th2 differentiation in leprosy.

The present study evaluates role of Notch1 signaling in the regulation of T cell immunity in leprosy. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from leprosy patients and healthy controls were activated with Mycobacterium leprae antigens along with activation of Notch1 signaling pathway and then lymphoproliferation was analyzed by lymphocytes transformation test and the expression of Notch1 and its ligands DLL1, Jagged1 and Jagged 2, T cell activation marker and Th1-Th2 cytokines on Th cells in PBMCs of study subjects were analyzed by flow cytometry. Further, these parameters were also analyzed after inhibition of Notch1 signaling pathway. Higher percentage of Notch1expressing Th cells were noted in TT/BT cases and higher percentage of DLL1 expressing Th cells in TT/BT and BL/LL cases. M. leprae antigens were found to induce the expression of Jagged1 on Th cells. Interestingly activation of Notch1 signaling pathway induced lymphoproliferation in BL/LL cases in response of PGL-1. Activation of Notch1 signaling was also found to induce the expression of T cell activation markers CD25, CD69 and Th1 cytokine IFN-γ in response to M. leprae antigens. Immunomodulation through Notch1 signaling seen in our study could be helpful in augmenting Th1 response in leprosy.

Association of Nitric Oxide Synthase2 gene polymorphisms with leprosy reactions in northern Indian population.

The pathogen Mycobacterium leprae causes leprosy that affects mainly skin and nerves. Polymorphisms of certain genes are substantiated to be associated with the susceptibility/resistance to leprosy. The present investigation addressed the association of Nitric Oxide Synthase2 gene polymorphisms and leprosy in a population from northern part of India. A total of 323 leprosy cases and 288 healthy controls were genotyped for four NOS2 promoter variants (rs1800482, rs2779249, rs8078340 and rs2301369) using FRET technology in Real Time PCR. None of these SNPs in promoter sites was associated with susceptibility/resistance to leprosy. NOS2 rs1800482 was found to be monomorphic with GG genotype. However, NOS2-1026T allele was observed to be in higher frequency with leprosy cases (BL and LL) who were not suffering from any reactional episodes compared to cases with ENL reaction {OR=0.30, 95% CI (0.10-0.86), p=0.024}. NOS2-1026GT genotype was more prevalent in cases without reaction (BT, BB and BL) compared to RR reactional patients {OR=0.38, 95% CI (0.17-0.86), p=0.02}. Although haplotype analysis revealed that no haplotype was associated with leprosy susceptibility/resistance with statistical significance, GTG haplotype was noted to be more frequent in healthy controls. These SNPs are observed to be in linkage disequilibrium. Although, these SNPs are not likely to influence leprosy vulnerability, -1026G>T SNP was indicated to have noteworthy role in leprosy reactions.